Papers › Explaining Recruitment to Extremism: A Bayesian Case-Control Approach
Explaining Recruitment to Extremism: A Bayesian Case-Control Approach
Roberto Cerina, Christopher Barrie, Neil Ketchley, Aaron Zelin
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Who joins extremist movements? Answering this question poses considerable methodological challenges. Survey techniques are infeasible and selective samples provide no counterfactual. Recruits can be assigned to contextual units, but this is vulnerable to problems of ecological inference. In this article, we take inspiration from epidemiology and elaborate a technique that combines survey and ecological approaches. The multilevel Bayesian case-control design that we propose allows us to identify individual-level and contextual factors patterning the incidence of recruitment, while accounting for rare events, contamination, and spatial autocorrelation. We validate our approach by matching a sample of Islamic State (ISIS) fighters from nine MENA countries with representative population surveys enumerated shortly before recruits joined the movement. High status individuals in their early twenties with university education were more likely to join ISIS. There is more mixed evidence for relative deprivation. We provide software for applied researchers to implement our method.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections