Papers › Explaining Neural Networks without Access to Training Data

Explaining Neural Networks without Access to Training Data

10 Jun 2022arXiv:2206.04891archive 2025-07-28

Sascha Marton, Stefan Lüdtke, Christian Bartelt, Andrej Tschalzev, Heiner Stuckenschmidt

We consider generating explanations for neural networks in cases where the network's training data is not accessible, for instance due to privacy or safety issues. Recently, ℐ-Nets have been proposed as a sample-free approach to post-hoc, global model interpretability that does not require access to training data. They formulate interpretation as a machine learning task that maps network representations (parameters) to a representation of an interpretable function. In this paper, we extend the ℐ-Net framework to the cases of standard and soft decision trees as surrogate models. We propose a suitable decision tree representation and design of the corresponding ℐ-Net output layers. Furthermore, we make ℐ-Nets applicable to real-world tasks by considering more realistic distributions when generating the ℐ-Net's training data. We empirically evaluate our approach against traditional global, post-hoc interpretability approaches and show that it achieves superior results when the training data is not accessible.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections