Papers › Explainability of Machine Learning Models under Missing Data

Explainability of Machine Learning Models under Missing Data

29 Jun 2024arXiv:2407.00411archive 2025-07-28

Tuan L. Vo, Thu Nguyen, Luis M. Lopez-Ramos, Hugo L. Hammer, Michael A. Riegler, Pal Halvorsen

Missing data is a prevalent issue that can significantly impair model performance and explainability. This paper briefly summarizes the development of the field of missing data with respect to Explainable Artificial Intelligence and experimentally investigates the effects of various imputation methods on SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations), a popular technique for explaining the output of complex machine learning models. Next, we compare different imputation strategies and assess their impact on feature importance and interaction as determined by Shapley values. Moreover, we also theoretically analyze the effects of missing values on Shapley values. Importantly, our findings reveal that the choice of imputation method can introduce biases that could lead to changes in the Shapley values, thereby affecting the explainability of the model. Moreover, we also show that a lower test prediction MSE (Mean Square Error) does not necessarily imply a lower MSE in Shapley values and vice versa. Also, while XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) is a method that could handle missing data directly, using XGBoost directly on missing data can seriously affect explainability compared to imputing the data before training XGBoost. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of imputation methods in the context of model explanations, offering practical guidance for selecting appropriate techniques based on dataset characteristics and analysis objectives. The results underscore the importance of considering imputation effects to ensure robust and reliable insights from machine learning models.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

simulamet-host/SHAP officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Explainable artificial intelligenceFeature ImportanceImputationMissing Values

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

SHAP

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections