Papers › Expert-guided Bayesian Optimisation for Human-in-the-loop Experimental Design of Known Systems

Expert-guided Bayesian Optimisation for Human-in-the-loop Experimental Design of Known Systems

5 Dec 2023arXiv:2312.02852archive 2025-07-28

Tom Savage, Ehecatl Antonio del Rio Chanona

Domain experts often possess valuable physical insights that are overlooked in fully automated decision-making processes such as Bayesian optimisation. In this article we apply high-throughput (batch) Bayesian optimisation alongside anthropological decision theory to enable domain experts to influence the selection of optimal experiments. Our methodology exploits the hypothesis that humans are better at making discrete choices than continuous ones and enables experts to influence critical early decisions. At each iteration we solve an augmented multi-objective optimisation problem across a number of alternate solutions, maximising both the sum of their utility function values and the determinant of their covariance matrix, equivalent to their total variability. By taking the solution at the knee point of the Pareto front, we return a set of alternate solutions at each iteration that have both high utility values and are reasonably distinct, from which the expert selects one for evaluation. We demonstrate that even in the case of an uninformed practitioner, our algorithm recovers the regret of standard Bayesian optimisation.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2312.02852")

Code

Syntology Ran 6 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 4 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 6 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 10 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

trsav/hitl-bo officialmentioned in paperjaxMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

6ran
4unverified

Licence: 0 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from trsav/hitl-bo. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

create_prompt trsav/hitl-bo/bo/reccomender.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · d16d3b2b4597fe7a · report
format_data trsav/hitl-bo/bo/utils.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 77467af29804f6b4 · report
post_process_local trsav/hitl-bo/bo/reccomender.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · ce8eb67226b502b7 · report
run_prompt trsav/hitl-bo/bo/reccomender.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 566145be7bbffc44 · report
sample_bounds trsav/hitl-bo/bo/utils.py official repository ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 4b63e0de00750f3d · report
sample_function trsav/hitl-bo/bo/utils.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 283aeb93a0f20a70 · report
bo trsav/hitl-bo/bo/visualisation.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 83126daa27625663 · report
plot_regret trsav/hitl-bo/bo/plotting.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 8728676cac6bb50a · report
plot_simple_regret trsav/hitl-bo/bo/plotting.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 71443846d1101306 · report
plot_simple_regret_alts trsav/hitl-bo/bo/plotting.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · b6a63e25c6bdb760 · report

Tasks

Bayesian OptimisationDecision MakingExperimental Design

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

SET

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections