Papers › Evaluation of Multilingual Image Captioning: How far can we get with CLIP models?

Evaluation of Multilingual Image Captioning: How far can we get with CLIP models?

10 Feb 2025arXiv:2502.06600archive 2025-07-28

Gonçalo Gomes, Chrysoula Zerva, Bruno Martins

The evaluation of image captions, looking at both linguistic fluency and semantic correspondence to visual contents, has witnessed a significant effort. Still, despite advancements such as the CLIPScore metric, multilingual captioning evaluation has remained relatively unexplored. This work presents several strategies, and extensive experiments, related to evaluating CLIPScore variants in multilingual settings. To address the lack of multilingual test data, we consider two different strategies: (1) using quality aware machine-translated datasets with human judgements, and (2) re-purposing multilingual datasets that target semantic inference and reasoning. Our results highlight the potential of finetuned multilingual models to generalize across languages and to handle complex linguistic challenges. Tests with machine-translated data show that multilingual CLIPScore models can maintain a high correlation with human judgements across different languages, and additional tests with natively multilingual and multicultural data further attest to the high-quality assessments.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

gecgomes/Multilingual_IC_Eval officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Image CaptioningSemantic correspondence

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

AWARE

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections