Papers › Evaluation of Multi-indicator And Multi-organ Medical Image Segmentation Models
Evaluation of Multi-indicator And Multi-organ Medical Image Segmentation Models
Qi Ye, Lihua Guo
In recent years, "U-shaped" neural networks featuring encoder and decoder structures have gained popularity in the field of medical image segmentation. Various variants of this model have been developed. Nevertheless, the evaluation of these models has received less attention compared to model development. In response, we propose a comprehensive method for evaluating medical image segmentation models for multi-indicator and multi-organ (named MIMO). MIMO allows models to generate independent thresholds which are then combined with multi-indicator evaluation and confidence estimation to screen and measure each organ. As a result, MIMO offers detailed information on the segmentation of each organ in each sample, thereby aiding developers in analyzing and improving the model. Additionally, MIMO can produce concise usability and comprehensiveness scores for different models. Models with higher scores are deemed to be excellent models, which is convenient for clinical evaluation. Our research tests eight different medical image segmentation models on two abdominal multi-organ datasets and evaluates them from four perspectives: correctness, confidence estimation, Usable Region and MIMO. Furthermore, robustness experiments are tested. Experimental results demonstrate that MIMO offers novel insights into multi-indicator and multi-organ medical image evaluation and provides a specific and concise measure for the usability and comprehensiveness of the model. Code: https://github.com/SCUT-ML-GUO/MIMO
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections