Papers › Evaluation of direct inversion of proton radiographs in the context of cylindrical implosions

Evaluation of direct inversion of proton radiographs in the context of cylindrical implosions

1 Mar 2022arXiv:2203.00495links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

J. R. Davies, P. V. Heuer

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Direct inversion of deflectometry data, such as proton radiographs and shadowgraphs, is a well-posed problem with a unique solution for the transverse deflection of each particle or ray if their trajectories do not cross. When trajectories cross, there exists an infinite set of solutions. In proton radiography direct inversion determines the line-integrated transverse Lorentz force. We have tested five publicly available direct inversion routines with a view to analyzing proton radiographs of cylindrical implosions on the OMEGA laser; four Monge-Amp\`{e}re solvers [github.com/flash-center/PRaLine, github.com/flash-center/PROBLEM, github.com/mfkasim1/invert-shadowgraphy/tree/fast-inverse, github.com/OxfordHED/proton-radiography-no-source], and a power-diagram method [github.com/mfkasim1/invert-shadowgraphy]. Test problems were generated using four field profiles, three cylindrical and one spherical, with varying field amplitudes in proton-tracing routines. Two Monge-Amp\`{e}re solvers did not run, the other two failed to reproduce radiographs when trajectories crossed, although for one field profile the solutions only diverged from the original at the boundary. The power-diagram method was successful even when proton trajectories crossed, giving a solution that minimized proton deflection, but failed for profiles that produced a single, sufficiently sharp peak. For cases where trajectories do not cross, the Monge-Amp\`{e}re solvers have the advantage of being considerably faster than the power-diagram routine, up to $1000$ times in our tests. The test problems are provided in the supplementary information in pradformat [github.com/phyzicist/pradformat].

PaperPDFCode

Code

OxfordHED/proton-radiography-no-source officialmentioned in paper report
flash-center/PROBLEM officialmentioned in paper report
flash-center/PRaLine officialmentioned in paper report
mfkasim1/invert-shadowgraphy officialmentioned in paper report
phyzicist/pradformat officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections