Papers › Evaluation of Audio-Visual Alignments in Visually Grounded Speech Models
Evaluation of Audio-Visual Alignments in Visually Grounded Speech Models
Khazar Khorrami, Okko Räsänen
Systems that can find correspondences between multiple modalities, such as between speech and images, have great potential to solve different recognition and data analysis tasks in an unsupervised manner. This work studies multimodal learning in the context of visually grounded speech (VGS) models, and focuses on their recently demonstrated capability to extract spatiotemporal alignments between spoken words and the corresponding visual objects without ever been explicitly trained for object localization or word recognition. As the main contributions, we formalize the alignment problem in terms of an audiovisual alignment tensor that is based on earlier VGS work, introduce systematic metrics for evaluating model performance in aligning visual objects and spoken words, and propose a new VGS model variant for the alignment task utilizing cross-modal attention layer. We test our model and a previously proposed model in the alignment task using SPEECH-COCO captions coupled with MSCOCO images. We compare the alignment performance using our proposed evaluation metrics to the semantic retrieval task commonly used to evaluate VGS models. We show that cross-modal attention layer not only helps the model to achieve higher semantic cross-modal retrieval performance, but also leads to substantial improvements in the alignment performance between image object and spoken words.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections