Papers › Evaluating the Instruction-following Abilities of Language Models using Knowledge Tasks

Evaluating the Instruction-following Abilities of Language Models using Knowledge Tasks

16 Oct 2024arXiv:2410.12972archive 2025-07-28

Rudra Murthy, Prince Kumar, Praveen Venkateswaran, Danish Contractor

In this work, we focus our attention on developing a benchmark for instruction-following where it is easy to verify both task performance as well as instruction-following capabilities. We adapt existing knowledge benchmarks and augment them with instructions that are a) conditional on correctly answering the knowledge task or b) use the space of candidate options in multiple-choice knowledge-answering tasks. This allows us to study model characteristics, such as their change in performance on the knowledge tasks in the presence of answer-modifying instructions and distractor instructions. In contrast to existing benchmarks for instruction following, we not only measure instruction-following capabilities but also use LLM-free methods to study task performance. We study a series of openly available large language models of varying parameter sizes (1B-405B) and closed source models namely GPT-4o-mini, GPT-4o. We find that even large-scale instruction-tuned LLMs fail to follow simple instructions in zero-shot settings. We release our dataset, the benchmark, code, and results for future work.

PaperPDFCode

Code

ibm/KCIF officialmentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Instruction FollowingMultiple-choice

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

KCIF

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

AttentionFocusSoftmax

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections