Papers › Evaluating the effectiveness of public policies on COVID-19 containment: A PSM-DID approach
Evaluating the effectiveness of public policies on COVID-19 containment: A PSM-DID approach
Zihan Wang
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The implementation of public policies is crucial in controlling the spread of COVID-19. However, the effectiveness of different policies can vary across different aspects of epidemic containment. Identifying the most effective policies is essential for providing informed recommendations for pandemic control. This paper examines the relationship between various public policy responses and their impact on COVID-19 containment. Using the propensity score matching-difference in differences (PSM-DID) model to address endogeneity, we analyze the causal significance of each policy on epidemic control. Our analysis reveals that that policies related to vaccine delivery, debt relief, and the cancellation of public events are the most effective measures. These findings provide key insights for policymakers, highlighting the importance of focusing on specific, high-impact measures in managing public health crises.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections