Papers › Evaluating Regular Path Queries on Compressed Adjacency Matrices

Evaluating Regular Path Queries on Compressed Adjacency Matrices

27 Jul 2023arXiv:2307.14930links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Diego Arroyuelo, Adrián Gómez-Brandón, Gonzalo Navarro

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Regular Path Queries (RPQs), which are essentially regular expressions to be matched against the labels of paths in labeled graphs, are at the core of graph database query languages like SPARQL. A way to solve RPQs is to translate them into a sequence of operations on the adjacency matrices of each label. We design and implement a Boolean algebra on sparse matrix representations and, as an application, use them to handle RPQs. Our baseline representation uses the same space as the previously most compact index for RPQs and outperforms it on the hardest types of queries -- those where both RPQ endpoints are unspecified. Our more succinct structure, based on k²-trees, is 4 times smaller than any existing representation that handles RPQs, and still solves complex RPQs in a few seconds. Our new sparse-matrix-based representations dominate a good portion of the space/time tradeoff map, being outperformed only by representations that use much more space. They are also of independent interest beyond solving RPQs.

PaperPDFCode

Code

adriangbrandon/rpq-matrix officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections