Papers › Evaluating Multichannel Speech Enhancement Algorithms at the Phoneme Scale Across Genders

Evaluating Multichannel Speech Enhancement Algorithms at the Phoneme Scale Across Genders

23 Jun 2025arXiv:2506.18691links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Nasser-Eddine Monir, Paul Magron, Romain Serizel

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Multichannel speech enhancement algorithms are essential for improving the intelligibility of speech signals in noisy environments. These algorithms are usually evaluated at the utterance level, but this approach overlooks the disparities in acoustic characteristics that are observed in different phoneme categories and between male and female speakers. In this paper, we investigate the impact of gender and phonetic content on speech enhancement algorithms. We motivate this approach by outlining phoneme- and gender-specific spectral features. Our experiments reveal that while utterance-level differences between genders are minimal, significant variations emerge at the phoneme level. Results show that the tested algorithms better reduce interference with fewer artifacts on female speech, particularly in plosives, fricatives, and vowels. Additionally, they demonstrate greater performance for female speech in terms of perceptual and speech recognition metrics.

PaperPDFCode

Code

nasseredd/mcse-phg officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections