Papers › Evaluating Large Language Models in Semantic Parsing for Conversational Question...

Evaluating Large Language Models in Semantic Parsing for Conversational Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs

3 Jan 2024arXiv:2401.01711archive 2025-07-28

Phillip Schneider, Manuel Klettner, Kristiina Jokinen, Elena Simperl, Florian Matthes

Conversational question answering systems often rely on semantic parsing to enable interactive information retrieval, which involves the generation of structured database queries from a natural language input. For information-seeking conversations about facts stored within a knowledge graph, dialogue utterances are transformed into graph queries in a process that is called knowledge-based conversational question answering. This paper evaluates the performance of large language models that have not been explicitly pre-trained on this task. Through a series of experiments on an extensive benchmark dataset, we compare models of varying sizes with different prompting techniques and identify common issue types in the generated output. Our results demonstrate that large language models are capable of generating graph queries from dialogues, with significant improvements achievable through few-shot prompting and fine-tuning techniques, especially for smaller models that exhibit lower zero-shot performance.

PaperPDFCode

Code

sebischair/llm-sp-cqa officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Conversational Question AnsweringInformation RetrievalKnowledge GraphsQuestion AnsweringRetrievalSemantic Parsing

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections