Papers › Evaluating How Fine-tuning on Bimodal Data Effects Code Generation

Evaluating How Fine-tuning on Bimodal Data Effects Code Generation

15 Nov 2022arXiv:2211.07842archive 2025-07-28

Gabriel Orlanski, Seonhye Yang, Michael Healy

Despite the increase in popularity of language models for code generation, it is still unknown how training on bimodal coding forums affects a model's code generation performance and reliability. We, therefore, collect a dataset of over 2.2M StackOverflow questions with answers for finetuning. These fine-tuned models have average pass@k improvements of 54.64% and 85.35% on the HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021) and Mostly Basic Program Problems (Austin et al., 2021) tasks, respectively. This regime further decreases the number of generated programs with both syntax and runtime errors. However, we find that at higher temperatures, there are significant decreases to the model's ability to generate runnable programs despite higher pass@k scores, underscoring the need for better methods of incorporating such data that mitigate these side effects. The code can be found https://github.com/gabeorlanski/bimodalcode-generation

PaperPDFCode

Code

gabeorlanski/bimodal-code-generation officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Code GenerationHumanEval

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections