Papers › Evaluating Deep Vs. Wide & Deep Learners As Contextual Bandits For Personalized Email...

Evaluating Deep Vs. Wide & Deep Learners As Contextual Bandits For Personalized Email Promo Recommendations

31 Jan 2022arXiv:2202.00146archive 2025-07-28

Aleksey A. Kocherzhenko, Nirmal Sobha Kartha, Tengfei Li, Hsin-Yi, Shih, Marco Mandic, Mike Fuller, Arshak Navruzyan

Personalization enables businesses to learn customer preferences from past interactions and thus to target individual customers with more relevant content. We consider the problem of predicting the optimal promotional offer for a given customer out of several options as a contextual bandit problem. Identifying information for the customer and/or the campaign can be used to deduce unknown customer/campaign features that improve optimal offer prediction. Using a generated synthetic email promo dataset, we demonstrate similar prediction accuracies for (a) a wide and deep network that takes identifying information (or other categorical features) as input to the wide part and (b) a deep-only neural network that includes embeddings of categorical features in the input. Improvements in accuracy from including categorical features depends on the variability of the unknown numerical features for each category. We also show that selecting options using upper confidence bound or Thompson sampling, approximated via Monte Carlo dropout layers in the wide and deep models, slightly improves model performance.

PaperPDFCode

Code

fellowship/deep-and-wide-bandit officialmentioned in papertf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Multi-Armed BanditsThompson Sampling

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

DropoutMonte Carlo Dropout

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections