Papers › Evaluating bulk flow estimators for CosmicFlows-4 measurements
Evaluating bulk flow estimators for CosmicFlows-4 measurements
A. M. Whitford, C. Howlett, T. M. Davis
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
For over a decade there have been contradictory claims in the literature about whether the local bulk flow motion of galaxies is consistent or in tension with the ΛCDM model. While it has become evident that systematics affect bulk flow measurements, systematics in the estimators have not been widely investigated. In this work, we thoroughly evaluate the performance of four estimator variants, including the Kaiser maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and the minimum variance estimator (MVE). We find that these estimators are unbiased, however their precision may be strongly correlated with the survey geometry. Small biases in the estimators can be present leading to underestimated bulk flows, which we suspect are due to the presence of non-linear peculiar velocities. The uncertainty assigned to the bulk flows from these estimators is typically underestimated, which leads to an overestimate of the tension with ΛCDM. We estimate the bulk flow for the CosmicFlows-4 data and use mocks to ensure the uncertainties are appropriately accounted for. Using the MLE we find a bulk flow amplitude of 408±165 km s⁻¹ at a depth of 49 Mpc h⁻¹, in reasonable agreement with ΛCDM. However using the MVE which can probe greater effective depths, we find an amplitude of 428±108 km s⁻¹ at a depth of 173 Mpc h⁻¹, in tension with the model, having only a 0.11% probability of obtaining a larger χ². These measurements appear directed towards the Great Attractor region where more data may be needed to resolve tensions.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections