Papers › EvaLDA: Efficient Evasion Attacks Towards Latent Dirichlet Allocation

EvaLDA: Efficient Evasion Attacks Towards Latent Dirichlet Allocation

9 Dec 2020arXiv:2012.04864archive 2025-07-28

Qi Zhou, Haipeng Chen, Yitao Zheng, Zhen Wang

As one of the most powerful topic models, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) has been used in a vast range of tasks, including document understanding, information retrieval and peer-reviewer assignment. Despite its tremendous popularity, the security of LDA has rarely been studied. This poses severe risks to security-critical tasks such as sentiment analysis and peer-reviewer assignment that are based on LDA. In this paper, we are interested in knowing whether LDA models are vulnerable to adversarial perturbations of benign document examples during inference time. We formalize the evasion attack to LDA models as an optimization problem and prove it to be NP-hard. We then propose a novel and efficient algorithm, EvaLDA to solve it. We show the effectiveness of EvaLDA via extensive empirical evaluations. For instance, in the NIPS dataset, EvaLDA can averagely promote the rank of a target topic from 10 to around 7 by only replacing 1% of the words with similar words in a victim document. Our work provides significant insights into the power and limitations of evasion attacks to LDA models.

PaperPDFCode

Code

tools-only/Evasion-Attack-against-LDA-Model officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Information RetrievalRetrievalSentiment AnalysisTopic Modelsdocument understanding

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

LDA

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections