Papers › Estimation and inference in metabolomics with non-random missing data and latent factors

Estimation and inference in metabolomics with non-random missing data and latent factors

5 Sep 2019arXiv:1909.02644links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Chris McKennan, Carole Ober, Dan Nicolae

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

High throughput metabolomics data are fraught with both non-ignorable missing observations and unobserved factors that influence a metabolite's measured concentration, and it is well known that ignoring either of these complications can compromise estimators. However, current methods to analyze these data can only account for the missing data or unobserved factors, but not both. We therefore developed MetabMiss, a statistically rigorous method to account for both non-random missing data and latent factors in high throughput metabolomics data. Our methodology does not require the practitioner specify a probability model for the missing data, and makes investigating the relationship between the metabolome and tens, or even hundreds, of phenotypes computationally tractable. We demonstrate the fidelity of MetabMiss's estimates using both simulated and real metabolomics data. An R package that implements our method is available from https://github.com/chrismckennan/MetabMiss.

PaperPDFCode

Code

chrismckennan/MetabMiss officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections