Papers › Estimating the limiting shape of bivariate scaled sample clouds: with additional...
Estimating the limiting shape of bivariate scaled sample clouds: with additional benefits of self-consistent inference for existing extremal dependence properties
Emma S. Simpson, Jonathan A. Tawn
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The key to successful statistical analysis of bivariate extreme events lies in flexible modelling of the tail dependence relationship between the two variables. In the extreme value theory literature, various techniques are available to model separate aspects of tail dependence, based on different asymptotic limits. Results from Balkema and Nolde (2010) and Nolde (2014) highlight the importance of studying the limiting shape of an appropriately-scaled sample cloud when characterising the whole joint tail. We now develop the first statistical inference for this limit set, which has considerable practical importance for a unified inference framework across different aspects of the joint tail. Moreover, Nolde and Wadsworth (2022) link this limit set to various existing extremal dependence frameworks. Hence, a by-product of our new limit set inference is the first set of self-consistent estimators for several extremal dependence measures, avoiding the current possibility of contradictory conclusions. In simulations, our limit set estimator is successful across a range of distributions, and the corresponding extremal dependence estimators provide a major joint improvement and small marginal improvements over existing techniques. We consider an application to sea wave heights, where our estimates successfully capture the expected weakening extremal dependence as the distance between locations increases.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections