Papers › Estimating Mutual Information via Geodesic $k$NN
Estimating Mutual Information via Geodesic $k$NN
Alexander Marx, Jonas Fischer
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Estimating mutual information (MI) between two continuous random variables X and Y allows to capture non-linear dependencies between them, non-parametrically. As such, MI estimation lies at the core of many data science applications. Yet, robustly estimating MI for high-dimensional X and Y is still an open research question. In this paper, we formulate this problem through the lens of manifold learning. That is, we leverage the common assumption that the information of X and Y is captured by a low-dimensional manifold embedded in the observed high-dimensional space and transfer it to MI estimation. As an extension to state-of-the-art $k$NN estimators, we propose to determine the k-nearest neighbors via geodesic distances on this manifold rather than from the ambient space, which allows us to estimate MI even in the high-dimensional setting. An empirical evaluation of our method, G-KSG, against the state-of-the-art shows that it yields good estimations of MI in classical benchmark and manifold tasks, even for high dimensional datasets, which none of the existing methods can provide.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections