Papers › Estimating Fold Changes from Partially Observed Outcomes with Applications in...
Estimating Fold Changes from Partially Observed Outcomes with Applications in Microbial Metagenomics
David S Clausen, Sarah Teichman, Amy D Willis
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We consider the problem of estimating fold-changes in the expected value of a multivariate outcome observed with unknown sample-specific and category-specific perturbations. This challenge arises in high-throughput sequencing studies of the abundance of microbial taxa because microbes are systematically over- and under-detected relative to their true abundances. Our model admits a partially identifiable estimand, and we establish full identifiability by imposing interpretable parameter constraints. To reduce bias and guarantee the existence of estimators in the presence of sparse observations, we apply an asymptotically negligible and constraint-invariant penalty to our estimating function. We develop a fast coordinate descent algorithm for estimation, and an augmented Lagrangian algorithm for estimation under null hypotheses. We construct a model-robust score test and demonstrate valid inference even for small sample sizes and violated distributional assumptions. The flexibility of the approach and comparisons to related methods are illustrated through a meta-analysis of microbial associations with colorectal cancer.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections