Papers › Error Feedback Shines when Features are Rare

Error Feedback Shines when Features are Rare

24 May 2023arXiv:2305.15264archive 2025-07-28

Peter Richtárik, Elnur Gasanov, Konstantin Burlachenko

We provide the first proof that gradient descent (GD) with greedy sparsification (TopK) and error feedback (EF) can obtain better communication complexity than vanilla GD when solving the distributed optimization problem min_(x∈ℝᵈ) f(x)=1/n∑ᵢ₌₁ⁿ fᵢ(x), where n = # of clients, d = # of features, and f₁,…,fₙ are smooth nonconvex functions. Despite intensive research since 2014 when EF was first proposed by Seide et al., this problem remained open until now. We show that EF shines in the regime when features are rare, i.e., when each feature is present in the data owned by a small number of clients only. To illustrate our main result, we show that in order to find a random vector x̂ such that ‖∇f(x̂) ‖² ≤ε in expectation, GD with the Top1 sparsifier and EF requires O (( L+r √( c/n min( c/n maxᵢ Lᵢ², 1/n∑ᵢ₌₁ⁿ Lᵢ² ) )) 1/ε ) bits to be communicated by each worker to the server only, where L is the smoothness constant of f, Lᵢ is the smoothness constant of fᵢ, c is the maximal number of clients owning any feature (1≤c ≤n), and r is the maximal number of features owned by any client (1≤r ≤d). Clearly, the communication complexity improves as c decreases (i.e., as features become more rare), and can be much better than the O(r L 1/ε) communication complexity of GD in the same regime.

PaperPDFCode

Code

burlachenkok/ef21_with_rare_features officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Distributed Optimization

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections