Papers › ERM++: An Improved Baseline for Domain Generalization

ERM++: An Improved Baseline for Domain Generalization

4 Apr 2023arXiv:2304.01973archive 2025-07-28

Piotr Teterwak, Kuniaki Saito, Theodoros Tsiligkaridis, Kate Saenko, Bryan A. Plummer

Domain Generalization (DG) aims to develop classifiers that can generalize to new, unseen data distributions, a critical capability when collecting new domain-specific data is impractical. A common DG baseline minimizes the empirical risk on the source domains. Recent studies have shown that this approach, known as Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM), can outperform most more complex DG methods when properly tuned. However, these studies have primarily focused on a narrow set of hyperparameters, neglecting other factors that can enhance robustness and prevent overfitting and catastrophic forgetting, properties which are critical for strong DG performance. In our investigation of training data utilization (i.e., duration and setting validation splits), initialization, and additional regularizers, we find that tuning these previously overlooked factors significantly improves model generalization across diverse datasets without adding much complexity. We call this improved, yet simple baseline ERM++. Despite its ease of implementation, ERM++ improves DG performance by over 5\% compared to prior ERM baselines on a standard benchmark of 5 datasets with a ResNet-50 and over 15\% with a ViT-B/16. It also outperforms all state-of-the-art methods on DomainBed datasets with both architectures. Importantly, ERM++ is easy to integrate into existing frameworks like DomainBed, making it a practical and powerful tool for researchers and practitioners. Overall, ERM++ challenges the need for more complex DG methods by providing a stronger, more reliable baseline that maintains simplicity and ease of use. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/piotr-teterwak/erm_plusplus}

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from piotr-teterwak/erm_plusplus. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections