Papers › ePillID Dataset: A Low-Shot Fine-Grained Benchmark for Pill Identification

ePillID Dataset: A Low-Shot Fine-Grained Benchmark for Pill Identification

28 May 2020arXiv:2005.14288archive 2025-07-28

Naoto Usuyama, Natalia Larios Delgado, Amanda K. Hall, Jessica Lundin

Identifying prescription medications is a frequent task for patients and medical professionals; however, this is an error-prone task as many pills have similar appearances (e.g. white round pills), which increases the risk of medication errors. In this paper, we introduce ePillID, the largest public benchmark on pill image recognition, composed of 13k images representing 9804 appearance classes (two sides for 4902 pill types). For most of the appearance classes, there exists only one reference image, making it a challenging low-shot recognition setting. We present our experimental setup and evaluation results of various baseline models on the benchmark. The best baseline using a multi-head metric-learning approach with bilinear features performed remarkably well; however, our error analysis suggests that they still fail to distinguish particularly confusing classes. The code and data are available at https://github.com/usuyama/ePillID-benchmark.

PaperPDFCode

Code

usuyama/ePillID-benchmark officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Few-Shot Image ClassificationFine-Grained Image RecognitionFine-Grained Visual CategorizationImage ClassificationMetric LearningPill Classification (Both Sides)

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

ePillID

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections