Papers › Ensemble of Averages: Improving Model Selection and Boosting Performance in Domain...
Ensemble of Averages: Improving Model Selection and Boosting Performance in Domain Generalization
Devansh Arpit, Huan Wang, Yingbo Zhou, Caiming Xiong
In Domain Generalization (DG) settings, models trained independently on a given set of training domains have notoriously chaotic performance on distribution shifted test domains, and stochasticity in optimization (e.g. seed) plays a big role. This makes deep learning models unreliable in real world settings. We first show that this chaotic behavior exists even along the training optimization trajectory of a single model, and propose a simple model averaging protocol that both significantly boosts domain generalization and diminishes the impact of stochasticity by improving the rank correlation between the in-domain validation accuracy and out-domain test accuracy, which is crucial for reliable early stopping. Taking advantage of our observation, we show that instead of ensembling unaveraged models (that is typical in practice), ensembling moving average models (EoA) from independent runs further boosts performance. We theoretically explain the boost in performance of ensembling and model averaging by adapting the well known Bias-Variance trade-off to the domain generalization setting. On the DomainBed benchmark, when using a pre-trained ResNet-50, this ensemble of averages achieves an average of 68.0%, beating vanilla ERM (w/o averaging/ensembling) by ∼4%, and when using a pre-trained RegNetY-16GF, achieves an average of 76.6%, beating vanilla ERM by 6%. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/salesforce/ensemble-of-averages}.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2110.10832")
Code
Syntology Ran 2 of 2 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.
By repository: official repository: 2 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
2 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 2 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from salesforce/ensemble-of-averages. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
5e5f34bd72149c91 · report
b617416b75fcbe19 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Generalization | DomainNet | Ensemble of Averages (RegNetY-16GF) | Average Accuracy | 60.9 | #10 of 38 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | DomainNet | Ensemble of Averages (ResNeXt-50 32x4d) | Average Accuracy | 54.6 | #17 of 38 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | DomainNet | Ensemble of Averages (ResNet-50) | Average Accuracy | 47.4 | #25 of 38 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | Office-Home | Ensemble of Averages (RegNetY-16GF) | Average Accuracy | 83.9 | #9 of 45 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | Office-Home | Ensemble of Averages (ResNeXt-50 32x4d) | Average Accuracy | 80.2 | #16 of 45 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | Office-Home | Ensemble of Averages (ResNet-50) | Average Accuracy | 72.5 | #23 of 45 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | PACS | Ensemble of Averages (RegNetY-16GF) | Average Accuracy | 95.8 | #13 of 133 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | PACS | Ensemble of Averages (ResNeXt-50 32x4d) | Average Accuracy | 93.2 | #16 of 133 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | PACS | Ensemble of Averages (ResNet-50) | Average Accuracy | 88.6 | #25 of 133 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | TerraIncognita | Ensemble of Averages (RegNetY-16GF) | Average Accuracy | 61.1 | #5 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | TerraIncognita | Ensemble of Averages (ResNeXt-50 32x4d) | Average Accuracy | 55.2 | #13 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | TerraIncognita | Ensemble of Averages (ResNet-50) | Average Accuracy | 52.3 | #18 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VLCS | Ensemble of Averages (RegNetY-16GF) | Average Accuracy | 81.1 | #17 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VLCS | Ensemble of Averages (ResNeXt-50 32x4d) | Average Accuracy | 80.4 | #18 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VLCS | Ensemble of Averages (ResNet-50) | Average Accuracy | 79.1 | #30 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections