Papers › Enhancing VAEs for Collaborative Filtering: Flexible Priors & Gating Mechanisms
Enhancing VAEs for Collaborative Filtering: Flexible Priors & Gating Mechanisms
Daeryong Kim, Bongwon Suh
Neural network based models for collaborative filtering have started to gain attention recently. One branch of research is based on using deep generative models to model user preferences where variational autoencoders were shown to produce state-of-the-art results. However, there are some potentially problematic characteristics of the current variational autoencoder for CF. The first is the too simplistic prior that VAEs incorporate for learning the latent representations of user preference. The other is the model's inability to learn deeper representations with more than one hidden layer for each network. Our goal is to incorporate appropriate techniques to mitigate the aforementioned problems of variational autoencoder CF and further improve the recommendation performance. Our work is the first to apply flexible priors to collaborative filtering and show that simple priors (in original VAEs) may be too restrictive to fully model user preferences and setting a more flexible prior gives significant gains. We experiment with the VampPrior, originally proposed for image generation, to examine the effect of flexible priors in CF. We also show that VampPriors coupled with gating mechanisms outperform SOTA results including the Variational Autoencoder for Collaborative Filtering by meaningful margins on 2 popular benchmark datasets (MovieLens & Netflix).
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommendation Systems | MovieLens 20M | H+Vamp Gated | Recall@20 | 0.41308 | #9 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Recommendation Systems | MovieLens 20M | H+Vamp Gated | Recall@50 | 0.55109 | #9 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Recommendation Systems | MovieLens 20M | H+Vamp Gated | nDCG@100 | 0.44522 | #9 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Recommendation Systems | Netflix | H+Vamp Gated | Recall@20 | 0.37678 | #1 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Recommendation Systems | Netflix | H+Vamp Gated | Recall@50 | 0.46252 | #1 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Recommendation Systems | Netflix | H+Vamp Gated | nDCG@100 | 0.40861 | #1 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections