Papers › Enhancing the Spatial Resolution of Stereo Images Using a Parallax Prior
Enhancing the Spatial Resolution of Stereo Images Using a Parallax Prior
Daniel S. Jeon, Seung-Hwan Baek, Inchang Choi, Min H. Kim
We present a novel method that can enhance the spatial resolution of stereo images using a parallax prior. While traditional stereo imaging has focused on estimating depth from stereo images, our method utilizes stereo images to enhance spatial resolution instead of estimating disparity. The critical challenge for enhancing spatial resolution from stereo images: how to register corresponding pixels with subpixel accuracy. Since disparity in traditional stereo imaging is calculated per pixel, it is directly inappropriate for enhancing spatial resolution. We, therefore, learn a parallax prior from stereo image datasets by jointly training two-stage networks. The first network learns how to enhance the spatial resolution of stereo images in luminance, and the second network learns how to reconstruct a high-resolution color image from high-resolution luminance and chrominance of the input image. Our two-stage joint network enhances the spatial resolution of stereo images significantly more than single-image super-resolution methods. The proposed method is directly applicable to any stereo depth imaging methods, enabling us to enhance the spatial resolution of stereo images.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stereo Image Super-Resolution | Flickr1024 - 2x upscaling | StereoSR | PSNR | 25.96 | #10 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Stereo Image Super-Resolution | Flickr1024 - 4x upscaling | StereoSR | PSNR | 21.70 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Stereo Image Super-Resolution | KITTI2012 - 2x upscaling | StereoSR | PSNR | 29.51 | #5 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Stereo Image Super-Resolution | KITTI2012 - 4x upscaling | StereoSR | PSNR | 24.53 | #9 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Stereo Image Super-Resolution | KITTI2015 - 2x upscaling | StereoSR | PSNR | 29.33 | #9 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Stereo Image Super-Resolution | KITTI2015 - 4x upscaling | StereoSR | PSNR | 24.21 | #9 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Stereo Image Super-Resolution | Middlebury - 2x upscaling | StereoSR | PSNR | 34.90 | #7 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Stereo Image Super-Resolution | Middlebury - 4x upscaling | StereoSR | PSNR | 27.64 | #9 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections