Papers › Enhancing Targeted Minority Class Prediction in Sentence-Level Relation Extraction
Enhancing Targeted Minority Class Prediction in Sentence-Level Relation Extraction
Hyeong-Ryeol Baek, Yong-Suk Choi
Sentence-level relation extraction (RE) has a highly imbalanced data distribution that about 80% of data are labeled as negative, i.e., no relation; and there exist minority classes (MC) among positive labels; furthermore, some of MC instances have an incorrect label. Due to those challenges, i.e., label noise and low source availability, most of the models fail to learn MC and get zero or very low F1 scores on MCs. Previous studies, however, have rather focused on micro F1 scores and MCs have not been addressed adequately. To tackle high mis-classification errors for MCs, we introduce (1) a minority class attention module (MCAM), and (2) effective augmentation methods specialized in RE. MCAM calculates the confidence scores on MC instances to select reliable ones for augmentation, and aggregates MCs information in the process of training a model. Our experiments show that our methods achieve a state-of-the-art F1 scores on TACRED as well as enhancing minority class F1 score dramatically.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relation Extraction | TACRED | RE-MC | F1 | 75.4 | #4 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections