Papers › Enhancing Geometric Factors in Model Learning and Inference for Object Detection and...

Enhancing Geometric Factors in Model Learning and Inference for Object Detection and Instance Segmentation

7 May 2020arXiv:2005.03572archive 2025-07-28

Zhaohui Zheng, Ping Wang, Dongwei Ren, Wei Liu, Rongguang Ye, QinGhua Hu, WangMeng Zuo

Deep learning-based object detection and instance segmentation have achieved unprecedented progress. In this paper, we propose Complete-IoU (CIoU) loss and Cluster-NMS for enhancing geometric factors in both bounding box regression and Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS), leading to notable gains of average precision (AP) and average recall (AR), without the sacrifice of inference efficiency. In particular, we consider three geometric factors, i.e., overlap area, normalized central point distance and aspect ratio, which are crucial for measuring bounding box regression in object detection and instance segmentation. The three geometric factors are then incorporated into CIoU loss for better distinguishing difficult regression cases. The training of deep models using CIoU loss results in consistent AP and AR improvements in comparison to widely adopted ℓₙ-norm loss and IoU-based loss. Furthermore, we propose Cluster-NMS, where NMS during inference is done by implicitly clustering detected boxes and usually requires less iterations. Cluster-NMS is very efficient due to its pure GPU implementation, and geometric factors can be incorporated to improve both AP and AR. In the experiments, CIoU loss and Cluster-NMS have been applied to state-of-the-art instance segmentation (e.g., YOLACT and BlendMask-RT), and object detection (e.g., YOLO v3, SSD and Faster R-CNN) models. Taking YOLACT on MS COCO as an example, our method achieves performance gains as +1.7 AP and +6.2 AR₁₀₀ for object detection, and +0.9 AP and +3.5 AR₁₀₀ for instance segmentation, with 27.1 FPS on one NVIDIA GTX 1080Ti GPU. All the source code and trained models are available at https://github.com/Zzh-tju/CIoU

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2005.03572")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 5 code samples harvested from 0 repositories linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: 5 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

Zzh-tju/CIoU officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
Zzh-tju/DIoU mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
Zzh-tju/DIoU-SSD-pytorch mentioned on GitHubpytorchGPL-3.0 report
Zzh-tju/DIoU-darknet mentioned on GitHubGPL-3.0 report
Zzh-tju/DIoU-pytorch-detectron mentioned on GitHubpytorchGPL-3.0 report
Zzh-tju/ultralytics-YOLOv3-Cluster-NMS mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 2 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
1ran · our draft was wrong
3unverified

Licence: 5 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

floatn identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · honoured contract fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · ed702a199df9d0db · report
load_classes identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong licence of this copy not recorded · fa99a26b6ba8f205 · report
ciou identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 3af5f4c25470e411 · report
diou identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 7faff7636d39a255 · report
labels_to_class_weights identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 25f32f40bc0cba2f · report

Tasks

ClusteringInstance SegmentationObjectObject DetectionSegmentationSemantic Segmentationobject-detectionregression

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

1x1 ConvolutionConvolutionNon Maximum SuppressionSSD

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections