Papers › Enhancing crop segmentation in satellite image time-series with transformer networks

Enhancing crop segmentation in satellite image time-series with transformer networks

3 Apr 2024ACNP 2024 4archive 2025-07-28

Ignazio Gallo, Mattia Gatti, Nicola Landro, C. Loschiavo, M. Boschetti, Riccardo La Grassa, A. U. Rehman

Recent studies have shown that Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) achieve impressive results in crop segmentation of Satellite Image Time-Series (SITS). However, the emergence of transformer networks in various vision tasks raises the question of whether they can outperform CNNs in crop segmentation of SITS. This paper presents a revised version of the Transformer-based Swin UNETR model adapted specifically for crop segmentation of SITS. The proposed model demonstrates significant advancements, achieving a validation accuracy of 96.14% and a test accuracy of 95.26% on the Munich dataset, surpassing the previous best results of 93.55% for validation and 92.94% for the test. Additionally, the model’s performance on the Lombardia dataset is comparable to UNet3D and superior to FPN and DeepLabV3. Experiments of this study indicate that the model will likely achieve comparable or superior accuracy to CNNs while requiring significantly less training time. These findings highlight the potential of transformer-based architectures for crop segmentation in SITS, opening new avenues for remote sensing applications.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

SegmentationSemantic SegmentationTime SeriesUNET Segmentation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Semantic Segmentation Lombardia Sentinel-2 Image Time Series for Crop Mapping UNet3D Overall Accuracy 80.77 #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation Lombardia Sentinel-2 Image Time Series for Crop Mapping Swin UNETR Overall Accuracy 79.64 #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation Lombardia Sentinel-2 Image Time Series for Crop Mapping 3D FPN with NDVI Loss Overall Accuracy 77.23 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation Lombardia Sentinel-2 Image Time Series for Crop Mapping DeepLabv3 3D Overall Accuracy 74.51 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
UNET Segmentation Munich Sentinel2 Crop Segmentation Swin UNETR Overall Accuracy 95.26 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
UNET Segmentation Munich Sentinel2 Crop Segmentation UNet3D Overall Accuracy 94.73 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
UNET Segmentation Munich Sentinel2 Crop Segmentation DeepLabv3 3D Overall Accuracy 85.98 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

1x1 ConvolutionAttentionBatch NormalizationConcatenated Skip ConnectionConvolutionDense ConnectionsFPNLinear LayerMax PoolingMulti-Head AttentionPosition-Wise Feed-Forward LayerReLUResidual ConnectionSoftmaxU-NetUNETR

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections