Papers › ENHANCE (ENriching Health data by ANnotations of Crowd and Experts): A case study for...

ENHANCE (ENriching Health data by ANnotations of Crowd and Experts): A case study for skin lesion classification

27 Jul 2021arXiv:2107.12734archive 2025-07-28

Ralf Raumanns, Gerard Schouten, Max Joosten, Josien P. W. Pluim, Veronika Cheplygina

We present ENHANCE, an open dataset with multiple annotations to complement the existing ISIC and PH2 skin lesion classification datasets. This dataset contains annotations of visual ABC (asymmetry, border, colour) features from non-expert annotation sources: undergraduate students, crowd workers from Amazon MTurk and classic image processing algorithms. In this paper we first analyse the correlations between the annotations and the diagnostic label of the lesion, as well as study the agreement between different annotation sources. Overall we find weak correlations of non-expert annotations with the diagnostic label, and low agreement between different annotation sources. We then study multi-task learning (MTL) with the annotations as additional labels, and show that non-expert annotations can improve (ensembles of) state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks via MTL. We hope that our dataset can be used in further research into multiple annotations and/or MTL. All data and models are available on Github: https://github.com/raumannsr/ENHANCE.

PaperPDFCode

Code

raumannsr/ENHANCE officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

DiagnosticLesion ClassificationMulti-Task LearningSkin Lesion Classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

ABC

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections