Papers › Engineering Optimal Parallel Task Scheduling
Engineering Optimal Parallel Task Scheduling
Matthew Akram, Nikolai Maas, Peter Sanders, Dominik Schreiber
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The NP-hard scheduling problem P||C_max encompasses a set of tasks with known execution time which must be mapped to a set of identical machines such that the overall completion time is minimized. In this work, we improve existing techniques for optimal P||C_max scheduling with a combination of new theoretical insights and careful practical engineering. Most importantly, we derive techniques to prune vast portions of the search space of branch-and-bound (BnB) approaches. We also propose improved upper and lower bounding techniques which can be combined with any approach to P||C_max. Moreover, we present new benchmarks for P||C_max, based on diverse application data, which can shed light on aspects which prior synthetic instances fail to capture. In an extensive evaluation, we observe that our pruning techniques reduce the number of explored nodes by 90× and running times by 12×. Compared to a state-of-the-art ILP-based approach, our approach is preferable for short running time limits and for instances with large makespans.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections