Papers › End-to-End Speech Recognition and Disfluency Removal with Acoustic Language Model Pretraining

End-to-End Speech Recognition and Disfluency Removal with Acoustic Language Model Pretraining

8 Sep 2023arXiv:2309.04516archive 2025-07-28

Saksham Bassi, Giulio Duregon, Siddhartha Jalagam, David Roth

The SOTA in transcription of disfluent and conversational speech has in recent years favored two-stage models, with separate transcription and cleaning stages. We believe that previous attempts at end-to-end disfluency removal have fallen short because of the representational advantage that large-scale language model pretraining has given to lexical models. Until recently, the high dimensionality and limited availability of large audio datasets inhibited the development of large-scale self-supervised pretraining objectives for learning effective audio representations, giving a relative advantage to the two-stage approach, which utilises pretrained representations for lexical tokens. In light of recent successes in large scale audio pretraining, we revisit the performance comparison between two-stage and end-to-end model and find that audio based language models pretrained using weak self-supervised objectives match or exceed the performance of similarly trained two-stage models, and further, that the choice of pretraining objective substantially effects a model's ability to be adapted to the disfluency removal task.

PaperPDFCode

Code

davidsroth/hubert-disfl officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingSpeech Recognitionspeech-recognition

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections