Papers › Enabling Causal Discovery in Post-Nonlinear Models with Normalizing Flows

Enabling Causal Discovery in Post-Nonlinear Models with Normalizing Flows

6 Jul 2024arXiv:2407.04980archive 2025-07-28

Nu Hoang, Bao Duong, Thin Nguyen

Post-nonlinear (PNL) causal models stand out as a versatile and adaptable framework for modeling intricate causal relationships. However, accurately capturing the invertibility constraint required in PNL models remains challenging in existing studies. To address this problem, we introduce CAF-PoNo (Causal discovery via Normalizing Flows for Post-Nonlinear models), harnessing the power of the normalizing flows architecture to enforce the crucial invertibility constraint in PNL models. Through normalizing flows, our method precisely reconstructs the hidden noise, which plays a vital role in cause-effect identification through statistical independence testing. Furthermore, the proposed approach exhibits remarkable extensibility, as it can be seamlessly expanded to facilitate multivariate causal discovery via causal order identification, empowering us to efficiently unravel complex causal relationships. Extensive experimental evaluations on both simulated and real datasets consistently demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms several state-of-the-art approaches in both bivariate and multivariate causal discovery tasks.

PaperPDFCode

Code

htn274/cafpono officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Causal Discoverystatistical independence testing

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Normalizing Flows

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections