Papers › Employing Crowdsourcing for Enriching a Music Knowledge Base in Higher Education

Employing Crowdsourcing for Enriching a Music Knowledge Base in Higher Education

12 Jun 2023arXiv:2306.07310archive 2025-07-28

Vassilis Lyberatos, Spyridon Kantarelis, Eirini Kaldeli, Spyros Bekiaris, Panagiotis Tzortzis, Orfeas Menis - Mastromichalakis, Giorgos Stamou

This paper describes the methodology followed and the lessons learned from employing crowdsourcing techniques as part of a homework assignment involving higher education students of computer science. Making use of a platform that supports crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain students were solicited to enrich the metadata associated with a selection of music tracks. The results of the campaign were further analyzed and exploited by students through the use of semantic web technologies. In total, 98 students participated in the campaign, contributing more than 6400 annotations concerning 854 tracks. The process also led to the creation of an openly available annotated dataset, which can be useful for machine learning models for music tagging. The campaign's results and the comments gathered through an online survey enable us to draw some useful insights about the benefits and challenges of integrating crowdsourcing into computer science curricula and how this can enhance students' engagement in the learning process.

PaperPDFCode

Code

vaslyb/music-crowd officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Music Tagging

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

MusicCrowd

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections