Papers › ELEVATER: A Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Language-Augmented Visual Models

ELEVATER: A Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Language-Augmented Visual Models

19 Apr 2022arXiv:2204.08790archive 2025-07-28

Chunyuan Li, Haotian Liu, Liunian Harold Li, Pengchuan Zhang, Jyoti Aneja, Jianwei Yang, Ping Jin, Houdong Hu, Zicheng Liu, Yong Jae Lee, Jianfeng Gao

Learning visual representations from natural language supervision has recently shown great promise in a number of pioneering works. In general, these language-augmented visual models demonstrate strong transferability to a variety of datasets and tasks. However, it remains challenging to evaluate the transferablity of these models due to the lack of easy-to-use evaluation toolkits and public benchmarks. To tackle this, we build ELEVATER (Evaluation of Language-augmented Visual Task-level Transfer), the first benchmark and toolkit for evaluating(pre-trained) language-augmented visual models. ELEVATER is composed of three components. (i) Datasets. As downstream evaluation suites, it consists of 20 image classification datasets and 35 object detection datasets, each of which is augmented with external knowledge. (ii) Toolkit. An automatic hyper-parameter tuning toolkit is developed to facilitate model evaluation on downstream tasks. (iii) Metrics. A variety of evaluation metrics are used to measure sample-efficiency (zero-shot and few-shot) and parameter-efficiency (linear probing and full model fine-tuning). ELEVATER is a platform for Computer Vision in the Wild (CVinW), and is publicly released at at https://computer-vision-in-the-wild.github.io/ELEVATER/

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2204.08790")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 20 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 16 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it.

By repository: official repository: 11 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran; community (archive-listed): 9 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

Computer-Vision-in-the-Wild/Elevater_Toolkit_IC officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
computer-vision-in-the-wild/cvinw_readings officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report
eric-ai-lab/pevit mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
microsoft/GLIP mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
microsoft/esvit mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
microsoft/klite mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
microsoft/unicl mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
rsCPSyEu/ovd_cod mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
sincerass/mvlpt mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

20 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 16 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
2ran · fixture could not drive it
16unverified

Licence: 0 of the 20 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

window_partition Computer-Vision-in-the-Wild/Elevater_Toolkit_IC/vision_benchmark/models/cls_swin.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 144d10b49baeb8a6 · report
window_reverse Computer-Vision-in-the-Wild/Elevater_Toolkit_IC/vision_benchmark/models/cls_swin.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 61bf152e6a42a184 · report
ask_gpt3 Computer-Vision-in-the-Wild/Elevater_Toolkit_IC/vision_benchmark/commands/extract_gpt3_knowledge.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · ef2f936b8e5c816f · report
clone_loader Computer-Vision-in-the-Wild/Elevater_Toolkit_IC/vision_benchmark/evaluation/full_model_finetune.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · ea0010b94502a91c · report
get_cls_model Computer-Vision-in-the-Wild/Elevater_Toolkit_IC/vision_benchmark/models/cls_example.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · aa72222fcaba5411 · report
get_cls_model Computer-Vision-in-the-Wild/Elevater_Toolkit_IC/vision_benchmark/models/cls_swin.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 68f56d4679dbb36f · report
get_model Computer-Vision-in-the-Wild/Elevater_Toolkit_IC/vision_benchmark/models/declip.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · aead1abefc725217 · report
get_model Computer-Vision-in-the-Wild/Elevater_Toolkit_IC/vision_benchmark/models/mae.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 853c0a124b0d326e · report
get_model Computer-Vision-in-the-Wild/Elevater_Toolkit_IC/vision_benchmark/models/mocov3.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · c6f5f3a48a3d847d · report
get_zeroshot_model Computer-Vision-in-the-Wild/Elevater_Toolkit_IC/vision_benchmark/models/clip_example.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · deeacd37b9b6b8a5 · report
random_query Computer-Vision-in-the-Wild/Elevater_Toolkit_IC/vision_benchmark/commands/extract_gpt3_knowledge.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · c35a97c3423834d4 · report
glorot_uniform eric-ai-lab/pevit/vision_benchmark/evaluation/compacter_model.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · b2ee26e229353a37 · report
kronecker_product_einsum_batched eric-ai-lab/pevit/vision_benchmark/evaluation/compacter_model.py community (archive-listed) ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 59e2991d3f405758 · report
build_adapter_model eric-ai-lab/pevit/vision_benchmark/evaluation/adapter_model.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 497088982a2f6f81 · report
build_compacter_model eric-ai-lab/pevit/vision_benchmark/evaluation/compacter_model.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 052dba32d0be4f7e · report
extract_finetune_results eric-ai-lab/pevit/read_results.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 0fcad17cd3cdfb8d · report
extract_finetune_results eric-ai-lab/pevit/read_txt.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · d276b7d04501c57c · report
extract_finetune_results_para eric-ai-lab/pevit/read_txt.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · ced21f6a4b3113c2 · report
read_json eric-ai-lab/pevit/read_results.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 4e6ec58f35d0977b · report
read_json eric-ai-lab/pevit/read_txt.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 5f28aa08fa3d16f1 · report

Tasks

FairnessFew-Shot Image ClassificationFew-Shot Object DetectionImage ClassificationObject DetectionZero-Shot Image ClassificationZero-Shot Object Detectionimage-classificationobject-detection

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

ELEVATER

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Object Detection ELEVATER GLIP-T AP 62.6 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection ODinW Full-shot 35 Tasks GLIP-T AP 62.6 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Image Classification ICinW CLIP (ViT B-32) Average Score 56.64 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Image Classification ODinW GLIP (Tiny A) Average Score 11.4 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Object Detection ODinW GLIP (Tiny A) Average Score 11.4 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections