Papers › EfficientAD: Accurate Visual Anomaly Detection at Millisecond-Level Latencies
EfficientAD: Accurate Visual Anomaly Detection at Millisecond-Level Latencies
Kilian Batzner, Lars Heckler, Rebecca König
Detecting anomalies in images is an important task, especially in real-time computer vision applications. In this work, we focus on computational efficiency and propose a lightweight feature extractor that processes an image in less than a millisecond on a modern GPU. We then use a student-teacher approach to detect anomalous features. We train a student network to predict the extracted features of normal, i.e., anomaly-free training images. The detection of anomalies at test time is enabled by the student failing to predict their features. We propose a training loss that hinders the student from imitating the teacher feature extractor beyond the normal images. It allows us to drastically reduce the computational cost of the student-teacher model, while improving the detection of anomalous features. We furthermore address the detection of challenging logical anomalies that involve invalid combinations of normal local features, for example, a wrong ordering of objects. We detect these anomalies by efficiently incorporating an autoencoder that analyzes images globally. We evaluate our method, called EfficientAD, on 32 datasets from three industrial anomaly detection dataset collections. EfficientAD sets new standards for both the detection and the localization of anomalies. At a latency of two milliseconds and a throughput of six hundred images per second, it enables a fast handling of anomalies. Together with its low error rate, this makes it an economical solution for real-world applications and a fruitful basis for future research.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2303.14535")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 35 code samples harvested from 8 repositories linked to this paper; 34 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 35 samples from 8 repositories, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
33 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
35 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 34 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 35 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 8 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
4986e9bea3ab5f62 · report
1171ab65a42cb909 · report
65ccd9c3a0376427 · report
ded046c9ee356f89 · report
b0ac6b6a8e05c91a · report
92626665be140960 · report
a2984f3ccda7db18 · report
a3bf841cdd61584a · report
cf1eea789ca4d810 · report
45760bcd8da72e6f · report
3c3ed7dd6e348895 · report
f55436fae7d32859 · report
cb104f86feb3ef61 · report
5820f47382ce8e2e · report
8766003511e1dc5c · report
dfe0b32f2056683b · report
f85e08a3d3105e5c · report
e5349e913e0cf837 · report
a849040c6073d454 · report
144d898a5033505c · report
23bcd10959f6f3db · report
f1a2a9757a1d351a · report
27ada34ea43ef9cb · report
079e540378c4e38e · report
1a23741c704a331b · report
21a6b1479ce8651c · report
bde900c03717312f · report
fc52334326eef520 · report
65449a6185e6dc7f · report
077ad902098508f5 · report
a213bdb9746b0401 · report
08b41ec7d5727026 · report
b831876f274e1ec4 · report
d1db9216b1ac0ae2 · report
92db361050fcd08d · report
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | EfficientAD (early stopping) | Detection AUROC | 99.8 | #7 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | EfficientAD (early stopping) | FPS | 269 | #7 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | EfficientAD-M | Detection AUROC | 99.1 | #45 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | EfficientAD-M | FPS | 269 | #45 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | EfficientAD-M | Segmentation AUPRO | 93.5 | #45 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | EfficientAD-S | Detection AUROC | 98.7 | #51 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | EfficientAD-S | FPS | 614 | #51 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | EfficientAD-S | Segmentation AP | 65.9 | #51 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | EfficientAD-S | Segmentation AUPRO | 93.1 | #51 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec LOCO AD | EfficientAD-M | Avg. Detection AUROC | 90.7 | #6 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec LOCO AD | EfficientAD-M | Detection AUROC (only logical) | 86.8 | #6 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec LOCO AD | EfficientAD-M | Detection AUROC (only structural) | 94.7 | #6 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec LOCO AD | EfficientAD-M | Segmentation AU-sPRO (until FPR 5%) | 79.8 | #6 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec LOCO AD | EfficientAD-S | Avg. Detection AUROC | 90.0 | #10 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec LOCO AD | EfficientAD-S | Detection AUROC (only logical) | 85.8 | #10 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec LOCO AD | EfficientAD-S | Detection AUROC (only structural) | 94.1 | #10 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec LOCO AD | EfficientAD-S | Segmentation AU-sPRO (until FPR 5%) | 77.8 | #10 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | VisA | EfficientAD-M | Detection AUROC | 98.1 | #10 of 50 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | VisA | EfficientAD-M | Segmentation AUPRO (until 30% FPR) | 94.0 | #10 of 50 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | VisA | EfficientAD-S | Detection AUROC | 97.5 | #15 of 50 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | VisA | EfficientAD-S | Segmentation AUPRO (until 30% FPR) | 93.1 | #15 of 50 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections