Papers › Efficient Sparse-Reward Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning with a High Replay...

Efficient Sparse-Reward Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning with a High Replay Ratio and Regularization

10 Dec 2023arXiv:2312.05787archive 2025-07-28

Takuya Hiraoka

Reinforcement learning (RL) methods with a high replay ratio (RR) and regularization have gained interest due to their superior sample efficiency. However, these methods have mainly been developed for dense-reward tasks. In this paper, we aim to extend these RL methods to sparse-reward goal-conditioned tasks. We use Randomized Ensemble Double Q-learning (REDQ) (Chen et al., 2021), an RL method with a high RR and regularization. To apply REDQ to sparse-reward goal-conditioned tasks, we make the following modifications to it: (i) using hindsight experience replay and (ii) bounding target Q-values. We evaluate REDQ with these modifications on 12 sparse-reward goal-conditioned tasks of Robotics (Plappert et al., 2018), and show that it achieves about 2 × better sample efficiency than previous state-of-the-art (SoTA) RL methods. Furthermore, we reconsider the necessity of specific components of REDQ and simplify it by removing unnecessary ones. The simplified REDQ with our modifications achieves ∼8 × better sample efficiency than the SoTA methods in 4 Fetch tasks of Robotics.

PaperPDFCode

Code

takuyahiraoka/efficient-srgc-rl-with-a-high-rr-and-regularization officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Q-LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Double Q-learningExperience ReplayQ-Learning

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections