Papers › Retrieval with Learned Similarities
Retrieval with Learned Similarities
Bailu Ding, Jiaqi Zhai
Retrieval plays a fundamental role in recommendation systems, search, and natural language processing (NLP) by efficiently finding relevant items from a large corpus given a query. Dot products have been widely used as the similarity function in such tasks, enabled by Maximum Inner Product Search (MIPS) algorithms for efficient retrieval. However, state-of-the-art retrieval algorithms have migrated to learned similarities. These advanced approaches encompass multiple query embeddings, complex neural networks, direct item ID decoding via beam search, and hybrid solutions. Unfortunately, we lack efficient solutions for retrieval in these state-of-the-art setups. Our work addresses this gap by investigating efficient retrieval techniques with expressive learned similarity functions. We establish Mixture-of-Logits (MoL) as a universal approximator of similarity functions, demonstrate that MoL's expressiveness can be realized empirically to achieve superior performance on diverse retrieval scenarios, and propose techniques to retrieve the approximate top-k results using MoL with tight error bounds. Through extensive experimentation, we show that MoL, enhanced by our proposed mutual information-based load balancing loss, sets new state-of-the-art results across heterogeneous scenarios, including sequential retrieval models in recommendation systems and finetuning language models for question answering; and our approximate top-k algorithms outperform baselines by up to 66x in latency while achieving >.99 recall rate compared to exact algorithms.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommendation Systems | Amazon-Book | HSTU+MoL | HR@10 | 0.0613 | #14 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Recommendation Systems | Amazon-Book | HSTU+MoL | HR@50 | 0.1292 | #14 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Recommendation Systems | Amazon-Book | HSTU+MoL | NDCG@10 | 0.0350 | #14 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Recommendation Systems | Amazon-Book | HSTU+MoL | NDCG@50 | 0.0498 | #14 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Recommendation Systems | MovieLens 1M | HSTU+MoL | HR@10 (full corpus) | .3412 | #28 of 31 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Recommendation Systems | MovieLens 1M | HSTU+MoL | NDCG@10 (full corpus) | .1979 | #28 of 31 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections