Papers › Efficient Deep Clustering of Human Activities and How to Improve Evaluation

Efficient Deep Clustering of Human Activities and How to Improve Evaluation

17 Sep 2022Asian Conference on Machine Learning 2023 1arXiv:2209.08335archive 2025-07-28

Louis Mahon, Thomas Lukasiewicz

There has been much recent research on human activity re\-cog\-ni\-tion (HAR), due to the proliferation of wearable sensors in watches and phones, and the advances of deep learning methods, which avoid the need to manually extract features from raw sensor signals. A significant disadvantage of deep learning applied to HAR is the need for manually labelled training data, which is especially difficult to obtain for HAR datasets. Progress is starting to be made in the unsupervised setting, in the form of deep HAR clustering models, which can assign labels to data without having been given any labels to train on, but there are problems with evaluating deep HAR clustering models, which makes assessing the field and devising new methods difficult. In this paper, we highlight several distinct problems with how deep HAR clustering models are evaluated, describing these problems in detail and conducting careful experiments to explicate the effect that they can have on results. We then discuss solutions to these problems, and suggest standard evaluation settings for future deep HAR clustering models. Additionally, we present a new deep clustering model for HAR. When tested under our proposed settings, our model performs better than (or on par with) existing models, while also being more efficient and better able to scale to more complex datasets by avoiding the need for an autoencoder.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

Lou1sM/HAR officialpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ClusteringDeep ClusteringHuman Activity RecognitionImage Clustering

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Human Activity Recognition PAMAP2 Selective HAR Clustering ARI 0.814 #1 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Human Activity Recognition PAMAP2 Selective HAR Clustering NMI 0.884 #1 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering HAR Selective HAR Clustering Accuracy 0.753 #3 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering HAR Selective HAR Clustering NMI 0.760 #3 of 3 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections