Papers › Efficient Concentration with Gaussian Approximation
Efficient Concentration with Gaussian Approximation
Morgane Austern, Lester Mackey
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Concentration inequalities for the sample mean, like those due to Bernstein, Hoeffding, and Bentkus, are valid for any sample size but overly conservative, yielding confidence intervals that are unnecessarily wide. The central limit theorem (CLT) provides asymptotic confidence intervals with optimal width, but these are invalid for all sample sizes. To resolve this tension, we develop new computable concentration inequalities for bounded variables with asymptotically optimal size, finite-sample validity, and sub-Gaussian decay. These bounds enable the construction of efficient confidence intervals with correct coverage for any sample size and efficient empirical Berry-Esseen bounds that require no prior knowledge of the population variance. We derive our inequalities by tightly bounding non-uniform Kolmogorov and Wasserstein distances to a Gaussian using zero-bias couplings and Stein's method of exchangeable pairs and demonstrate practical improvements over the Bernstein, Hoeffding, Bentkus, Berry-Esseen, Feller-Cram\'er, Romano-Wolf, empirical Bernstein, empirical Bentkus, and coin-betting inequalities.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections