Papers › Efficient classical calculation of the Quantum Natural Gradient
Efficient classical calculation of the Quantum Natural Gradient
Tyson Jones
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Quantum natural gradient has emerged as a superior minimisation technique in quantum variational algorithms. Classically simulating the algorithm running on near-future quantum hardware is paramount in its study, as it is for all variational algorithms. In this case, state-vector simulation of the P-parameter/gate ansatz circuit does not dominate the runtime; instead, calculation of the Fisher information matrix becomes the bottleneck, involving O(P^3) gate evaluations, though this can be reduced to O(P^2) gates by using O(P) temporary state-vectors. This is similar to the gradient calculation subroutine dominating the simulation of quantum gradient descent, which has attracted HPC strategies and bespoke simulation algorithms with asymptotic speedups. We here present a novel simulation strategy to precisely calculate the quantum natural gradient in O(P^2) gates and O(1) state-vectors. While more complicated, our strategy is in the same spirit as that presented for gradients in Reference 6, and involves iteratively evaluating recurrent forms of the Fisher information matrix. Our strategy uses only "apply gate", "clone state" and "inner product" operations which are present in practically all quantum computing simulators. It is furthermore compatible with parallelisation schemes, like hardware acceleration and distribution. Since our scheme leverages a form of the Fisher information matrix for strictly unitary ansatz circuits, it cannot be simply extended to density matrix simulation of quantum natural gradient with non-unitary circuits.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections