Papers › Efficient and Accurate Gradients for Neural SDEs

Efficient and Accurate Gradients for Neural SDEs

27 May 2021NeurIPS 2021 12arXiv:2105.13493archive 2025-07-28

Patrick Kidger, James Foster, Xuechen Li, Terry Lyons

Neural SDEs combine many of the best qualities of both RNNs and SDEs: memory efficient training, high-capacity function approximation, and strong priors on model space. This makes them a natural choice for modelling many types of temporal dynamics. Training a Neural SDE (either as a VAE or as a GAN) requires backpropagating through an SDE solve. This may be done by solving a backwards-in-time SDE whose solution is the desired parameter gradients. However, this has previously suffered from severe speed and accuracy issues, due to high computational cost and numerical truncation errors. Here, we overcome these issues through several technical innovations. First, we introduce the \textit{reversible Heun method}. This is a new SDE solver that is \textit{algebraically reversible}: eliminating numerical gradient errors, and the first such solver of which we are aware. Moreover it requires half as many function evaluations as comparable solvers, giving up to a 1.98× speedup. Second, we introduce the \textit{Brownian Interval}: a new, fast, memory efficient, and exact way of sampling \textit{and reconstructing} Brownian motion. With this we obtain up to a 10.6× speed improvement over previous techniques, which in contrast are both approximate and relatively slow. Third, when specifically training Neural SDEs as GANs (Kidger et al. 2021), we demonstrate how SDE-GANs may be trained through careful weight clipping and choice of activation function. This reduces computational cost (giving up to a 1.87× speedup) and removes the numerical truncation errors associated with gradient penalty. Altogether, we outperform the state-of-the-art by substantial margins, with respect to training speed, and with respect to classification, prediction, and MMD test metrics. We have contributed implementations of all of our techniques to the torchsde library to help facilitate their adoption.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2105.13493")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 2 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

google-research/torchsde officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
patrick-kidger/torchcde officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

2 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · violated contract
1ran · our draft was wrong

Licence: 1 of the 2 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from google-research/torchsde. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

str2bool google-research/torchsde/examples/latent_sde.py official repository ran · violated contract Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 6a904c09f82ab220 · report
get_data identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · 582d465aad5dd543 · report

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections