Papers › Efficiency-Effectiveness Tradeoff of Probabilistic Structured Queries for...
Efficiency-Effectiveness Tradeoff of Probabilistic Structured Queries for Cross-Language Information Retrieval
Eugene Yang, Suraj Nair, Dawn Lawrie, James Mayfield, Douglas W. Oard, Kevin Duh
Probabilistic Structured Queries (PSQ) is a cross-language information retrieval (CLIR) method that uses translation probabilities statistically derived from aligned corpora. PSQ is a strong baseline for efficient CLIR using sparse indexing. It is, therefore, useful as the first stage in a cascaded neural CLIR system whose second stage is more effective but too inefficient to be used on its own to search a large text collection. In this reproducibility study, we revisit PSQ by introducing an efficient Python implementation. Unconstrained use of all translation probabilities that can be estimated from aligned parallel text would in the limit assign a weight to every vocabulary term, precluding use of an inverted index to serve queries efficiently. Thus, PSQ's effectiveness and efficiency both depend on how translation probabilities are pruned. This paper presents experiments over a range of modern CLIR test collections to demonstrate that achieving Pareto optimal PSQ effectiveness-efficiency tradeoffs benefits from multi-criteria pruning, which has not been fully explored in prior work. Our Python PSQ implementation is available on GitHub(https://github.com/hltcoe/PSQ) and unpruned translation tables are available on Huggingface Models(https://huggingface.co/hltcoe/psq_translation_tables).
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections