Papers › Effective semantic segmentation in Cataract Surgery: What matters most?

Effective semantic segmentation in Cataract Surgery: What matters most?

13 Aug 2021arXiv:2108.06119archive 2025-07-28

Theodoros Pissas, Claudio Ravasio, Lyndon Da Cruz, Christos Bergeles

Our work proposes neural network design choices that set the state-of-the-art on a challenging public benchmark on cataract surgery, CaDIS. Our methodology achieves strong performance across three semantic segmentation tasks with increasingly granular surgical tool class sets by effectively handling class imbalance, an inherent challenge in any surgical video. We consider and evaluate two conceptually simple data oversampling methods as well as different loss functions. We show significant performance gains across network architectures and tasks especially on the rarest tool classes, thereby presenting an approach for achieving high performance when imbalanced granular datasets are considered. Our code and trained models are available at https://github.com/RViMLab/MICCAI2021_Cataract_semantic_segmentation and qualitative results on unseen surgical video can be found at https://youtu.be/twVIPUj1WZM.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

rvimlab/miccai2021_cataract_semantic_segmentation officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

2D Semantic Segmentation task 1 (8 classes)2D Semantic Segmentation task 2 (17 classes)2D Semantic Segmentation task 3 (25 classes)Semantic Segmentation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
2D Semantic Segmentation task 3 (25 classes) CaDIS OCR-R50-Repeat Factor-Lovasz Mean IoU (test) 71.94 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
2D Semantic Segmentation task 3 (25 classes) CaDIS OCR-R50-Repeat Factor-Lovasz Mean IoU (val) 79.4 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
2D Semantic Segmentation task 3 (25 classes) CaDIS DeepLabv3+-R50-Repeat Factor-Lovasz Mean IoU (test) 70.51 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
2D Semantic Segmentation task 3 (25 classes) CaDIS DeepLabv3+-R50-Repeat Factor-Lovasz Mean IoU (val) 77.44 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
2D Semantic Segmentation task 3 (25 classes) CaDIS UPN-R50-Repeat Factor-Lovasz Mean IoU (test) 70.44 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
2D Semantic Segmentation task 3 (25 classes) CaDIS UPN-R50-Repeat Factor-Lovasz Mean IoU (val) 75.75 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections