Papers › Effect or Treatment Heterogeneity? Policy Evaluation with Aggregated and Disaggregated...

Effect or Treatment Heterogeneity? Policy Evaluation with Aggregated and Disaggregated Treatments

4 Oct 2021arXiv:2110.01427archive 2025-07-28

Phillip Heiler, Michael C. Knaus

Binary treatments are often ex-post aggregates of multiple treatments or can be disaggregated into multiple treatment versions. Thus, effects can be heterogeneous due to either effect or treatment heterogeneity. We propose a decomposition method that uncovers masked heterogeneity, avoids spurious discoveries, and evaluates treatment assignment quality. The estimation and inference procedure based on double/debiased machine learning allows for high-dimensional confounding, many treatments and extreme propensity scores. Our applications suggest that heterogeneous effects of smoking on birthweight are partially due to different smoking intensities and that gender gaps in Job Corps effectiveness are largely explained by differential selection into vocational training.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

MCKnaus/causalDML officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections