Papers › Echo chamber formation sharpened by priority users
Echo chamber formation sharpened by priority users
Henrique F. de Arruda, Kleber A. Oliveira, Yamir Moreno
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Priority users (e.g., verified profiles on Twitter) are social media users whose content is promoted by recommendation algorithms. However, the impact of this heterogeneous user influence on opinion dynamics, such as polarization phenomena, is unknown. We conduct a computational mechanistic investigation of such consequences in a stylized setting. First, we allow priority users, whose content has greater reach (similar to algorithmic boosting), into an opinion model on adaptive networks. Then, to exploit this gain in influence, we incorporate stubborn user behavior, i.e., zealot users who remain committed to opinions throughout the dynamics. Using a novel measure of echo chamber formation, we find that prioritizing users can inadvertently reduce polarization if they post according to the same rule but sharpen echo chamber formation if they behave heterogeneously. Moreover, we show that a minority of extremist ideologues (i.e., users who are both stubborn and priority) can push the system into a transition from consensus to polarization with echo chambers. Our findings imply that the implementation of the platform's prioritization policy should be carefully monitored in order to ensure there is no abuse of users with extra influence.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections