Papers › Early-Stage Anomaly Detection: A Study of Model Performance on Complete vs. Partial Flows

Early-Stage Anomaly Detection: A Study of Model Performance on Complete vs. Partial Flows

3 Jul 2024arXiv:2407.02856archive 2025-07-28

Adrian Pekar, Richard Jozsa

This study investigates the efficacy of machine learning models in network anomaly detection through the critical lens of partial versus complete flow information. We systematically evaluate how models perform under varying training and testing conditions, quantifying the performance impact when dealing with incomplete data typical in real-time environments. Our findings demonstrate a significant performance difference, with precision and recall dropping by up to 30% under certain conditions when models trained on complete flows are tested against partial flows. Conversely, models trained and tested on consistently complete or partial datasets maintain robustness. The study reveals that a minimum of 7 packets in the test set is required for maintaining reliable detection rates, providing valuable insights for real-time detection strategies. These results offer important guidance for deploying machine learning models in operational network security environments.

PaperPDFCode

Code

flowfrontiers/cyberml-completevsfirstn officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Anomaly Detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

SET

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections