Papers › Dynamics of node influence in network growth models

Dynamics of node influence in network growth models

1 Sep 2020arXiv:2009.00235archive 2025-07-28

Shravika Mittal, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Siddharth Pal

Many classes of network growth models have been proposed in the literature for capturing real-world complex networks. Existing research primarily focuses on global characteristics of these models, e.g., degree distribution. We aim to shift the focus towards studying the network growth dynamics from the perspective of individual nodes. In this paper, we study how a metric for node influence in network growth models behaves over time as the network evolves. This metric, which we call node visibility, captures the probability of the node to form new connections. First, we conduct an investigation on three popular network growth models -- preferential attachment, additive, and multiplicative fitness models; and primarily look into the "influential nodes" or "leaders" to understand how their visibility evolves over time. Subsequently, we consider a generic fitness model and observe that the multiplicative model strikes a balance between allowing influential nodes to maintain their visibility, while at the same time making it possible for new nodes to gain visibility in the network. Finally, we observe that a spatial growth model with multiplicative fitness can curtail the global reach of influential nodes, thereby allowing the emergence of a multiplicity of "local leaders" in the network.

PaperPDFCode

Code

mittalshravika/Network-Growth-Models officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections