Papers › Dynamic-SUPERB Phase-2: A Collaboratively Expanding Benchmark for Measuring the...

Dynamic-SUPERB Phase-2: A Collaboratively Expanding Benchmark for Measuring the Capabilities of Spoken Language Models with 180 Tasks

8 Nov 2024arXiv:2411.05361archive 2025-07-28

Chien-yu Huang, Wei-Chih Chen, Shu-wen Yang, Andy T. Liu, Chen-An Li, Yu-Xiang Lin, Wei-Cheng Tseng, Anuj Diwan, Yi-Jen Shih, Jiatong Shi, William Chen, Chih-Kai Yang, Wenze Ren, Xuanjun Chen, Chi-Yuan Hsiao, Puyuan Peng, Shih-Heng Wang, Chun-Yi Kuan, Ke-Han Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Fabian Ritter-Gutierrez, Kuan-Po Huang, Siddhant Arora, You-Kuan Lin, Ming To Chuang, Eunjung Yeo, Kalvin Chang, Chung-Ming Chien, Kwanghee Choi, Jun-You Wang, Cheng-Hsiu Hsieh, Yi-Cheng Lin, Chee-En Yu, I-Hsiang Chiu, Heitor R. Guimarães, Jionghao Han, Tzu-Quan Lin, Tzu-Yuan Lin, Homu Chang, Ting-Wu Chang, Chun Wei Chen, Shou-Jen Chen, Yu-Hua Chen, Hsi-Chun Cheng, Kunal Dhawan, Jia-Lin Fang, Shi-Xin Fang, Kuan-Yu Fang Chiang, Chi An Fu, Hsien-Fu Hsiao, Ching Yu Hsu, Shao-Syuan Huang, Lee Chen Wei, Hsi-Che Lin, Hsuan-Hao Lin, Hsuan-Ting Lin, Jian-Ren Lin, Ting-Chun Liu, Li-Chun Lu, Tsung-Min Pai, Ankita Pasad, Shih-Yun Shan Kuan, Suwon Shon, Yuxun Tang, Yun-Shao Tsai, Jui-Chiang Wei, Tzu-Chieh Wei, Chengxi Wu, Dien-Ruei Wu, Chao-Han Huck Yang, Chieh-Chi Yang, Jia Qi Yip, Shao-Xiang Yuan, Vahid Noroozi, Zhehuai Chen, Haibin Wu, Karen Livescu, David Harwath, Shinji Watanabe, Hung-Yi Lee

Multimodal foundation models, such as Gemini and ChatGPT, have revolutionized human-machine interactions by seamlessly integrating various forms of data. Developing a universal spoken language model that comprehends a wide range of natural language instructions is critical for bridging communication gaps and facilitating more intuitive interactions. However, the absence of a comprehensive evaluation benchmark poses a significant challenge. We present Dynamic-SUPERB Phase-2, an open and evolving benchmark for the comprehensive evaluation of instruction-based universal speech models. Building upon the first generation, this second version incorporates 125 new tasks contributed collaboratively by the global research community, expanding the benchmark to a total of 180 tasks, making it the largest benchmark for speech and audio evaluation. While the first generation of Dynamic-SUPERB was limited to classification tasks, Dynamic-SUPERB Phase-2 broadens its evaluation capabilities by introducing a wide array of novel and diverse tasks, including regression and sequence generation, across speech, music, and environmental audio. Evaluation results show that no model performed well universally. SALMONN-13B excelled in English ASR and Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct showed high accuracy in emotion recognition, but current models still require further innovations to handle a broader range of tasks. We open-source all task data and the evaluation pipeline at https://github.com/dynamic-superb/dynamic-superb.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

21 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 21 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 21 of the 21 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from dynamic-superb/dynamic-superb. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections